Iron fang solos?

[Bullockist]

I was reading the butchers theme force in nq 41, and it got me thinking.
In the solos entry it says ironfang solos and for the life of me i can only think of 1 (markov), does that mean we will be getting a new solo in colossals?
Or am i just getting excited over nothing . ;(

[SuperTheBoss]

If you look, other tier lists that allow for iron fangs (I forget, irusk, evlad, maybe some other) already say "iron fang solos" rather than just saying Markov specifically. PP will a lot of the time word things in a way that gives them the freedom to release what they want at a later time even if they have nothing planned in the immediate future. I guess there's always a possibility that we'll get a new iron fang solo, but I wouldn't take the butcher's theme force as evidence that we will.

[MagnustheJust]

There was a sizable SNAFU back in MK-I, with the Magnus Agenda contract - precursor to the current theme forces.

They had to amend the contract to allow Steelhead Heavy Cavalry and Stannis Brocker, instead og just the SH Halberdiers.

Mostly this is to prevent PP from having to backpedaling, and covering their butts when new shinies are released.

[Munindk]

Ebutchers list mentions Doom reaver solo's, which is kinda odd as Fenris isnt even a Doom reaver solo.

[scout's honor]

There are several theme forces across multiple factions that mention categories of models for which no actual model exists (yet).

The Fenris thing annoys me a bit but it doesn't affect relevant theme forces since he's just mentioned specifically in theme forces that allow Doomies. Same with Yuri and Manhunters.

[kommander_redfinger]

Are'nt the Great Bears usable that tier list?

[scout's honor]

Are'nt the Great Bears usable that tier list?
Yes, because they're an Iron Fang unit.

[Tyr852]

Are'nt the Great Bears usable that tier list?

I fell in to this trap , the Bears are Character units , not solos :) , makes no difference to the theme in this case though as Scout pointed out.