vintersbastard
Destroyer of Worlds

Drive-by's do work. Just because an abilitiy doesn't resolve immediatly doesn't mean it wasn't triggered - and the only condition for Abomination is...

Assuming that "horse charges" are supposed to be impact attacks, that would completely correct.

You mean besides the fact that you just put another 5-8 points of buffs in there? (I'm not sure whether you're leaving out Rangers, Finn, or the...

The only thing about high walls that prevents shooting is them blocking LOS. If the shooter ignores LOS, the walls do nothing.

With Sidearms the Def can get fairly high (15 easily, sometimes even more), so making sure you hit is pretty useful. If he's not upkeeping Sidearms,...

Just take Chain Guns then. They at least provide a little defensive tech, and d3+3 Pow 10s are hilarious on the feat turn. (I still don't see a...

He won't do a lot of heavy lifting himself (though taking out the Mechaniks with the feat is a good move, since they can't hide from that), but he's...

Well, the precise phrasing would be that "Ground Pounder is a ranged special attack that does not target anything." If you ever happen upon an...

Trouble is that the PKs usually won't have Shield Wall (outside of Unbound games), unless they activated first. If they do have Shield Wall, though,...

Field of Fire, LOS, and the line used for cover/concealment/intervening terrain are completely independent rules. The way you determine one has...

If you make a weapon lock, you have to declare which weapon with the open fist advantage you're using for this power attack, and can't use that...

That's correct; nothing is stopping the free strikers from making their attacks (in fact, they now hit automatically).

To be precise, Dark Sentinel does not trigger "after movement", but "when ending movement", therefore its resolution still belongs to the movement...

A few issues: - You have to try to break the lock, which is not that improbable to happen. - You don't get initial ranged attacks, only additional...

There is no "time those attacks are counted". Trample attacks rolls happens after all movement-triggered effects have been resolved, and if those...

Just to clear up some confusion issues you might have: Mootaz was an Infernal back then, so the ruling he gave in the thread you necroed earlier...

Nope, Defensive Strike would still go first, because it's part of resolving the movement, not the attack.

Something that's bugging me: Since when can Skorne take Gorman di Wulfe?

From what I can tell from earlier posts, you don't have to worry - he's just P+S 13. But he does come with Reach, so he actually outthreatens them by...

Try low ARM single-wounds that benefit from Camouflage (e.g. Idrians Skirmishers). Charging them improves your chances to hit markedly (assuming no...

Sorry, this: As noted in the thread I linked to, this doesn't hold for attacks that involve making multiple attacks (e.g. Strafe or Thresher). ...

Whoops, you're right; I apparently had a little calculation failure there. Still, a one in 36 chance ain't too bad.

Actually, that only applies to spray attacks. Every other kind of simultaneous attack requires you to make the attack and damage rolls against one...

What for? The distinction is very clear: Rampager allows you to take control of the beast, thereby making it an enemy model, which is now subject to...

How so? Str 13 isn't sufficient, and they can't Enrage it. Now, a Mauler is a completely different beast...

What for? It's not as people ever seem to bother reading the rules (which have a definition for Entering).

Nothing like a ruling, now is there?

I'm fairly certain that you need to contribute at least one other attack ("this attack" is the CRA, cf. here for a comparable case).

Exactly which part of "... affected models can spend focus points to boost attack and damage rolls at 1 focus point per boost" is unclear?

Anurien, you seem to be misunderstanding the "same-named effects don't stack" rule: It doesn't just mean that you cannot apply the same effect twice...