BurlyBastard
Warrior

Let's not stray too far into tactics in the rules forum, please.

In short, no, there are no official formats for something like this.

This is correct on all counts. ;)

The latest Errata doc (Jan 2013 at the time of this post) does not contain anything on it, so no.

This is correct. The rules forum is not really a place to ask for a "copy/paste" of the relevant sections of the rulebook, so I'm locking this one....

Could check with your EO, but my reading of that is "three games sequentially using the same warcaster/warlock, all won".

Ah, gotchya. They were, in fact, wrong. ;)

Incorrect at #2; Light Cavalry do not make Impact Attacks.

Because Light Cavalry can do so: Note, though, the restrictions I mention above.

No boost, as others have indicated since mount attacks cannot be boosted. No, because they do not have Virtuoso (or similar), so cannot make...

This is correct. And :Buckler: cookie for rules quote.

This is incorrect. Assault does not require a minimum distance moved to make the ranged attack. You are correct regarding the charge attack boosted...

Ah, yes, I took the OP's word for what Force Lock read and did not have card handy to verify. I do now ;). So, you can declare a charge while...

Correct, per:

You could never say this, as you charge to get the Assault shot, and saying "I choose to charge zero" is not legal in the strictest sense. If you...

The Cygnar Rangers do not give "aiming bonus;" they give +2 to attack rolls as their ability describes. Forfeiting movement for an aiming bonus also...

Correct, per:

We Infernals have made no such ruling. Gunfighter allows ranged attacks at models in your melee range. All other rules that apply to ranged attacks...