Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Default Geomancy and Fate Weaver

    Can a beast Geomancy an offensive spell owned by their controlling warlock if the warlock is affected by Fate Weaver?

    Fate Weaver: An affected enemy model cannot make attacks for one round
    Geomancy: ...this model can be forced to cast one of it's warlock's spells...This model's controller is considered to have cast the spell but this model is the point of origin
    Cheers.

  2. #2
    Conqueror
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Cracow, PL
    Posts
    288

    Default

    If i think correctly yes it is possible- it is rather about fury stat with which you cast a spell, but I don't place a bet on it.

  3. #3

    Default

    If fateweaver isn't affecting the geomancer then there is no restriction on his actions.

  4. #4
    Destroyer of Worlds solkan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,739

    Default

    See the sentence of the Geomancy rules immediately after the quoted excerpt:
    When making a magic attack roll, this model uses its controller's FURY.
    The model with Geomancy is the model making the magic attack. The bit about "is considered to have cast" is exactly the same as for the Skarlock's Spell Slave ability and is included for the same reason: After the spell is cast, the limitations for things like upkeep spells are retroactively applied as if the controlling model had cast the spell.

  5. #5
    Conqueror zyxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Here, Over There
    Posts
    395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pewter View Post
    Can a beast Geomancy an offensive spell owned by their controlling warlock if the warlock is affected by Fate Weaver?{
    yes, it can... Fate weaver has no effect on the models spell list, only its ability to make attacks... so another model that has the ability to use said spells via geomancy or spell slave, can.

    Quote Originally Posted by solkan View Post
    The bit about "is considered to have cast" is exactly the same as for the Skarlock's Spell Slave ability and is included for the same reason: After the spell is cast, the limitations for things like upkeep spells are retroactively applied as if the controlling model had cast the spell.
    what he said
    Last edited by zyxx; 04-04-2012 at 08:32 AM.

    I murder innocents for selfish gains and steal their souls for consumption, but I wouldn't say I'm evil.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •