Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 456789 LastLast
Results 281 to 320 of 327
  1. #281
    Conqueror Protest the Shredder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    189

    Default

    Now i'm interested in the ranged attack(s). Thinking maybe 1 long range Aoe. Would really like to see a fire breath thresher that is 3 or 4 inches out from base and covers the full front arc, around pow 14. On the melee side (depending on how they do its ranged) maybe 2 14s for the claws and an ap reach 4 tail pow 15. If the ranged attacks are good, I think it will be hard to see the ap on the tail.

  2. #282

    Default

    Based on the Bite, doesn't that make the Archangel STR 13? That's not bad for Sweeps.

  3. #283

    Default

    So four initials and a gun? We're looking at a guaranteed wall of text here.

  4. #284
    Destroyer of Worlds captainspud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Where Spuds Go
    Posts
    2,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rivenwyrm View Post
    Yeah, I agree there. Especially if he can make the thresher with that attack, Incite/Icy Grip/Breathstealer + thresh means dead infantry. Of course, it may be that the consume effect doesn't proc during a thresh since it's a power attack. Either way, if I'm using my 19pt model to kill small based infantry, I want it to be gone if I hit it.
    Sweep attacks lose all weapon special rules, just like all other power attacks. It's already been ruled that the Stormwall doesn't get electro-leaps on his, so the Archangel won't get Consume on hers.

    That said: super excited to add this thing to my dragons.
    The ignorant must be beaten with the Mallet of Wisdom until their heads are swollen and inflamed with knowledge.
    Check out my new blog, Captain Spud Is Amazing, where I post things on the schedule of "Whenever something's finished."
    My Painting/Conversion Thread | Full Privateer Release Schedule

  5. #285
    Destroyer of Worlds rivenwyrm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,356

    Default

    Yeah, I was pretty sure that was the case, just holdin' out hope. Ah well.
    Quote Originally Posted by LACK OF SUBTLETY View Post
    Ha! The internet is no place for common sense deductions about game-making decisions. It is a place for crazy speculation!

  6. #286
    Annihilator EtherealPaints's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    580

    Default

    The claws for the rest of the heavies are P+S 16. I would guess that the claws on this guy are going to be 17 minimum. Not convinced that the tail will have AP, but that would certainly be nice considering he's already got an answer for small based models. Maybe crit AP.

  7. #287
    Destroyer of Worlds Defenstrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Victoria /B.C. /Canada
    Posts
    11,583

    Default

    You think it will have that many melee attacks? All the rest have been limited to two initials.
    Quote Originally Posted by John of Arc View Post
    Who hates Steelheads? That's like saying "Man, f*** bread. Bread can go die."
    Our Warmachine and Hordes Blog.

  8. #288
    Destroyer of Worlds Northern Ronin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Defenstrator View Post
    You think it will have that many melee attacks? All the rest have been limited to two initials.
    This is a good point to bring up, but at the same time, the Legion one could be the inverse. Rather than having six shots every turn, it could have one shot, and several melee attacks. Of course, it could be off set by having lower fury (also makes sense due to our fury removal options, and they likely don't want more killer ranged out of Legion, between Lylyth and Ravagores with a Naga). I could see them going with like a Rapid Striking, low POW chain weapon tail to add the Anti-Infantry power many Colossals seem to bring to bear, without making it in the form of buffable guns.

  9. #289
    Destroyer of Worlds katadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,545

    Default

    well we already have the carni with 3 base attacks plus the spray on assault, so really needs to be on par with that doesnt it.
    Jaq Draco, Gunmage/Pistoleer - Inn of Odd Wanderings


  10. #290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Protest the Shredder View Post
    Would really like to see a fire breath thresher that is 3 or 4 inches out from base and covers the full front arc, around pow 14.
    Combustion like a Phoenix would be cool.

  11. #291
    Conqueror
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Heightened Metabolism might be a nice animus to put on the Archangel... might almost make you wanna bring Proteus..

  12. #292
    Badass Bagger Neutralyze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    farmington hills, MI
    Posts
    13,239

    Default

    Why, on hit you consume models.
    Quote Originally Posted by JBFlanz View Post
    Finally who lets Neturalyze troll your boards? Come on guys.


    Detroit Meta FTW!

  13. #293
    Destroyer of Worlds Defenstrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Victoria /B.C. /Canada
    Posts
    11,583

    Default

    So actually eating the models denies you the ability to gain sustanence from them. Irony.
    Quote Originally Posted by John of Arc View Post
    Who hates Steelheads? That's like saying "Man, f*** bread. Bread can go die."
    Our Warmachine and Hordes Blog.

  14. #294
    Conqueror
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    149

    Default

    for sweep. like with the MK. Presumably the consume doesnt apply to power attacks, like with e-leap on stormwall

  15. #295
    Annihilator
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Netherland
    Posts
    666

    Default

    I hope it can eat medium bases too

  16. #296
    Conqueror
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    149

    Default

    the text of consume specifies small base.

  17. #297
    Badass Bagger Neutralyze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    farmington hills, MI
    Posts
    13,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0ldsk00l View Post
    the text of consume specifies small base.
    Yes it does. youll notice that unless youre playing trolls with an abundance of medium bases that you wont really get much milage of out it. on top it that, you gotta bring proteus....
    Quote Originally Posted by JBFlanz View Post
    Finally who lets Neturalyze troll your boards? Come on guys.


    Detroit Meta FTW!

  18. #298
    Warrior
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Hmm Just thought of this: Archangel has an attack with his head, a head is not likely to be restricted to only left/right arc.. will we get an 180 decree sweep?!
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanz View Post
    WM/H; where rules are four-dimensional instead of linear.



  19. #299
    Annihilator Hussar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    563

    Default

    Awesome.
    Archangels; solving problems with sideway faceplants.
    Rejoice: For bad things are about to happen.

    And yes, that is the flying monkey that stole your avatar.

  20. #300
    Conqueror
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    149

    Default

    He may also have more than 1 melee weapon. But, yes, the Proteus tax was referenced in my first post on the matter.

  21. #301
    Conqueror sathoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    340

    Default

    As much as I want to rave about taking saeryn, stealing the breath out of the lungs of bane knights (makes perfect sense) and going "OM NOM NOM NOM NOM NO eGASPY FEAT BANES", if its true that specials don't count on power attacks, this is both saddening and makes me feel okay at the same time (Where the stormwall capable of electro-leaping thresher, would the 52-bane terminus blob even be able to take that kind of anti-infantry on the chin?)

  22. #302
    Warrior
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    80

    Default

    But you will eat the "Menoth book of even more denial" in one hit!
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanz View Post
    WM/H; where rules are four-dimensional instead of linear.



  23. #303
    Annihilator
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Netherland
    Posts
    666

    Default

    And the the 2 sworded solo that won't die in 1 turn and Harbinger cannot keep the pieces on the board ^^

  24. #304
    Conqueror
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    478

    Default

    I think consume is neat / flavorful, but being PS 19 makes it seem not relevant 95% of the time. It makes me wonder if the Archangel might have some passive ability that relates to consume (ie "Special Consumption - Whenever archangel consumes a model, do X.) Or if its really is just a neat ability tacked on that will come up in a handful of games.

  25. #305

    Default

    MK doesn't have snacking for obvious reasons... Could the Archangel get snacking on consumes? My logic here would be that a thresher would deny the consume special rule so the player couldn't just devastate an entire row of infantry and go from near dead to full health, limiting its regen to bought extra attacks mostly if against infantry.

    Anywho I really like the whole escalation thing, the Dragon Alliance already knows what Erthrubral is up to from Krueger, Toruk I assume as known for a while that he is more or less up and about, and now he is creating mini dragons and its most subtle lock is turning into a 120mm sled. LoE in the new book is just a gigantic middle finger to Immoren from the bodyless dragon.

  26. #306
    Destroyer of Worlds
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wutwut View Post
    MK doesn't have snacking for obvious reasons... Could the Archangel get snacking on consumes? My logic here would be that a thresher would deny the consume special rule so the player couldn't just devastate an entire row of infantry and go from near dead to full health, limiting its regen to bought extra attacks mostly if against infantry.

    Anywho I really like the whole escalation thing, the Dragon Alliance already knows what Erthrubral is up to from Krueger, Toruk I assume as known for a while that he is more or less up and about, and now he is creating mini dragons and its most subtle lock is turning into a 120mm sled. LoE in the new book is just a gigantic middle finger to Immoren from the bodyless dragon.
    Mountain king does have snacking actually. If MK means mountain king ofcourse and not molik karn

  27. #307

    Default

    Doesn't the archangel having ride by attack contradict the rules of a colossus/gargantuan that says they cannot have any movement outside of their normal movement, and hence couldn't be given sprint or anything like that? Or is it because you are technically just splitting up the normal movement it is allowed?

  28. #308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crate123 View Post
    Mountain king does have snacking actually. If MK means mountain king ofcourse and not molik karn
    Woooops my bad I got it mixed up with Regen (the other troll staple).

    Also are the colossals forbidden to move outside their movement phase or simply outside their activation, if its the second, ride-by is doable.

  29. #309
    Destroyer of Worlds Demeritus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,924

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KhisanthMagus View Post
    Doesn't the archangel having ride by attack contradict the rules of a colossus/gargantuan that says they cannot have any movement outside of their normal movement, and hence couldn't be given sprint or anything like that? Or is it because you are technically just splitting up the normal movement it is allowed?
    Ride by attacks split your movement between a move of however much followed by an interruption in that movement to perform combat actions followed by the rest of your movement.


  30. #310
    Destroyer of Worlds
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,401

    Default

    I have a feeling that if Archangel is getting into the thick of things, then something will have gone wrong. I predict it being a ranged-focus, hit and run Colossal.

    In other words, a scaled up Seraph, not an Angelius.

  31. #311
    Annihilator Fernslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Our Local Press Ganger was at Lock and Load, and said by the end that they had the full Sculpt of the AA done ready to be sent out to be cast. Anyone See that and have any Picts ??

  32. #312
    Destroyer of Worlds Defenstrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Victoria /B.C. /Canada
    Posts
    11,583

    Default

    I was at L&L and that isn't quite true. What was about finished was the basic armiture and muscles which there are lots of pictures of. That was pending final approval. Once that is done he'll be adding all the detail. He said to expect it around September at the earliest.
    Quote Originally Posted by John of Arc View Post
    Who hates Steelheads? That's like saying "Man, f*** bread. Bread can go die."
    Our Warmachine and Hordes Blog.

  33. #313
    Destroyer of Worlds
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Draznar View Post
    I think consume is neat / flavorful, but being PS 19 makes it seem not relevant 95% of the time. It makes me wonder if the Archangel might have some passive ability that relates to consume (ie "Special Consumption - Whenever archangel consumes a model, do X.) Or if its really is just a neat ability tacked on that will come up in a handful of games.
    Well, if it's literally consuming on 'hit,' which means there is no disabled or boxed process, let alone destroyed, it means the attack auto-kills Tough small figures, negates Self-Sacrifice and Martyrdom on small models, ignores Roth's Mercy on small models, etc. Plus RFP has its usual benefits.

  34. #314
    Destroyer of Worlds Lanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    Posts
    14,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by themocaw View Post
    I have a feeling that if Archangel is getting into the thick of things, then something will have gone wrong. I predict it being a ranged-focus, hit and run Colossal.

    In other words, a scaled up Seraph, not an Angelius.
    I'm fine with a scaled up seraph with a PS19 melee attack. If it's primarily a shooting/skirmishing model, but can hit like that, I'm sold.
    "If at first you don't succeed, label it version 1.0."


  35. #315
    Destroyer of Worlds StarmanTTLB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    East Providence, RI, USA
    Posts
    1,172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SageofLodoss View Post
    Well, if it's literally consuming on 'hit,' which means there is no disabled or boxed process, let alone destroyed, it means the attack auto-kills Tough small figures, negates Self-Sacrifice and Martyrdom on small models, ignores Roth's Mercy on small models, etc. Plus RFP has its usual benefits.
    True, and handy in many situations. However, generally I don't want my P+S19 melee attacks being directed at infantry models ^^ It isn't bad, it just seems like Consume is there more for the flavor than for the usefulness.

    I think we'll have to wait and see what other weapon(s) the Archangel has before we can really call judgement on it. I mean, if it has an AP tail strike like many have theorized, then I guess we can forgive Consume ^^
    Press Ganger for southern New England!
    Painted Model Count: We'll talk about this later...

  36. #316
    Annihilator Fernslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Defenstrator View Post
    I was at L&L and that isn't quite true. What was about finished was the basic armiture and muscles which there are lots of pictures of. That was pending final approval. Once that is done he'll be adding all the detail. He said to expect it around September at the earliest.
    That's what I thought ( as far as how much they got done on it) Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing the awesomness known as the finished product of the AA!! Thanks!

  37. #317
    Annihilator Fernslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    553

    Default

    So, once we get this beautiful model... How is everyone planning to transport it? My thoughts is the PP bag that stands on wheels that opens when laid flat on its back and Pluck Foam. That or very carefully stand it in a box with padding around it so i can keep an eye on it.

  38. #318
    Destroyer of Worlds Defenstrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Victoria /B.C. /Canada
    Posts
    11,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StarmanTTLB View Post
    True, and handy in many situations. However, generally I don't want my P+S19 melee attacks being directed at infantry models ^^ It isn't bad, it just seems like Consume is there more for the flavor than for the usefulness.
    Well it won't be the first. The Kraken has Amphbious even though as a colossal it can't be knocked down and comes with Pathfinder. Unless playing with deep water the rule effectively does nothing.
    Quote Originally Posted by John of Arc View Post
    Who hates Steelheads? That's like saying "Man, f*** bread. Bread can go die."
    Our Warmachine and Hordes Blog.

  39. #319
    Destroyer of Worlds
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,030

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fernslayer View Post
    So, once we get this beautiful model... How is everyone planning to transport it? My thoughts is the PP bag that stands on wheels that opens when laid flat on its back and Pluck Foam. That or very carefully stand it in a box with padding around it so i can keep an eye on it.
    I have a feeling the wings will be detachable by design, maybe they will include magnets like they did for bethayne. Otherwise Ill certainly magnetize it myself.

  40. #320
    Destroyer of Worlds Defenstrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Victoria /B.C. /Canada
    Posts
    11,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StarmanTTLB View Post
    True, and handy in many situations. However, generally I don't want my P+S19 melee attacks being directed at infantry models ^^ It isn't bad, it just seems like Consume is there more for the flavor than for the usefulness.
    Well it won't be the first. The Kraken has Amphbious even though as a colossal it can't be knocked down and comes with Pathfinder. Unless playing with deep water the rule effectively does nothing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crate123 View Post
    I have a feeling the wings will be detachable by design, maybe they will include magnets like they did for bethayne. Otherwise Ill certainly magnetize it myself.
    They've already stated that the wings will have pegs so they can slot in and then be removed for transportation.
    Last edited by Defenstrator; 07-01-2012 at 09:28 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by John of Arc View Post
    Who hates Steelheads? That's like saying "Man, f*** bread. Bread can go die."
    Our Warmachine and Hordes Blog.

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 456789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •