
Originally Posted by
Soulblighter
100% agree. Harbinger offed Voyle herself. Menoth didnt tell her to do it. Whenever the Harbinger speaks to Menoth, theres some real poltergeist crap that goes on, and there was no evidence of that when she gave Stryker her sword. And no Harbinger wouldnt have been punished for it because Menoth doesnt care about one man, even Voyle, hes only interested in the bigger picture which is winning his war with the devourer.
Couple of important quotes from PPS_Doug
The situation is filled with complexities and subtleties and gets to the very mind of Menoth, the Creator, which is unknowable. Hence the controversy, hence the "difficult theological question" being asked about. If it was clear and obvious and perfectly understandable, there would be no theological difficulties. That said, there is a perfectly internally consistent logic to what transpired. You can discern quite a bit by closely reading the related passages in Legends, in particular looking at the interactions between the Harbinger and Voyle. There is no clear consensus that Voyle specifically did anything "against Menoth." The drama unfolding between these three individuals (Voyle, the Harbinger, and Vilmon) involved each one fulfilling their role as they saw it, obeying their own rigid and uncompromising codes of behavior based on their divinely sanctioned purpose within the theocracy. The Harbinger acted as she must, Hierarch Voyle acted as he believed he must, and so did Dartan Vilmon, each in their own way.
There was no command by Menoth for Voyle not to enter Caspia; prophecies are not commands. This has mistakenly been taken as the root cause of what transpired with the Harbinger, but the text does not bear that out. The Harbinger's actions appear to have been rooted in the long term health of the faith and its likelihood of bringing in the greatest number of eventual converts. Voyle was warned that misfortune would come to a hierarch who entered Caspia before the city was united. Some have taken this statement combined with the Harbinger's actions to imply a self-fulfilling prophecy, but it could also be the Harbinger foresaw how the conquest into Caspia would tempt Voyle into acts of hubris and make him unable to make the best decision once the hostages were revealed. Once again, the Harbinger is the only one in possession of the facts. It is not my place to answer things which are mysteries to most of the inhabitants of our setting. If something is only known to the Harbinger, or Nyssor, or Menoth, or the Devourer Wurm, or Toruk, I'm not going to tell you what it is.
Any way you look at it, if this was an easily answered question, there would be no theological complications.
And this one!
While Providence was an important part of the final conclusion of that fight, due to Hierarch Voyle's skill, Warder is correct that the more important element of this entire exchange happened when Hierarch Voyle saw the Harbinger's blood on his own hands. This shattered the absolute faith that was the cornerstone of his power; he was unable to reconcile her actions to save Vilmon with his own beliefs regarding his personal authority and the righteousness of his cause. This led to a loss of control. It had nothing to do with obedience to the Harbinger. The Harbinger has no specific authority over the hierarch, except as a channel for the words of Menoth, who must be obeyed. It is always significant when the Harbinger and the hierarch are not in agreement. These sorts of disagreements will usually represent differences in the interpretation of doctrine, the True Law, or the will of Menoth.
It might be worth reading the text again more closely, paying particular attention to the actions chosen by those involved and their consequences. Never once did the Harbinger give the hierarch any orders or deny his authority. Vilmon's own defiance was rooted in adhering to his code by saving the lives of the faithful and he was clearly willing to accept the consequences of this action. Rather than picking any other method to intervene, the Harbinger chose to offer her own flesh in the place of Vilmon's, likely knowing this might reach Voyle in a way other actions would not. Unfortunately due to his pride, Voyle reacted with misdirected anger, unable to perceive any of his actions as flawed, and refused to turn from the course he was set upon.
Aaaaand this one, too:
She did not in fact kill [Voyle], nor was she simply ensuring that a prophecy came to pass. It was the hierarch's right to kill Vilmon for his disobedience even as it was the Harbinger's right to preserve his life and those on the wall. Voyle was killed by a Lord Commander of the Cygnaran Army, but the hierarch had the opportunity to avoid this death if he had understood the lesson the Harbinger offered him by the example of her own self sacrifice. It might have been he was incapable of understanding.
**Edit**
Another interesting one, for those interested! Doug really needs to be locked in a room and forced to put all this stuff and musings in one place!
What transpired in Legends was an extremely significant clash of stations and interpretations of purpose. We had several major aspects of the Protectorate at an impasse. This confrontation had to do with the authority and responsibilities of the hierarchy, the Order of the Wall, and the Harbinger. You need to read it again and try to remove your biases prompted by your loathing for Stryker. The true conflict takes place when Dartan Vilmon does what he feels he must to stay true to his obligations as a member of the Order of the Wall. You will notice as he does so he accepts that he will most likely die for this. He knows the hierarch has the right to slay him.
At the same time, the Harbinger has the absolute power to save the lives of the faithful, and can do so without being questioned on her choices. The Harbinger intervened as proof that she, as the chosen prophet of Menoth, places value in the Order of the Wall and their mission. She was not willing to let Vilmon expire. This is symbolic of shielding the Order of the Wall itself. She did not do so by stopping Voyle. She did so by offering her flesh for Vilmon's. This was a lesson that the destruction of the Order of the Wall would also be the destruction of the Harbinger. Voyle's largest mistake was not in putting the people in peril on the wall, but in failing to recognize the lesson of the Harbinger's intervention. It was his reaction which was emotional, not hers, and it was at this point that his absolute conviction in the rightness of his actions faltered, and his ability to perfectly manifest Menoth's power also failed.
The exact nature of the Harbinger within the Protectorate hierarchy is not an entirely comfortable matter. As she speaks for Menoth, she cannot be reprimanded or second-guessed. Yet at the same time, in every legal sense, the hierarch's will is absolute and his orders cannot be questioned. When these two entities are in agreement, everything works fine. When they are not, it created a paradox in authority for anyone below them. The hierarch and the Synod have all recognized the Harbinger's legitimacy. At the same time, she is still a person and is not manifesting Menoth's will at all times. She is at all times filled with the god's power and has been given unique gifts of perspective and insight that transcend the mortal. But it is not entirely clear to anyone in the Protectorate how often she is acting from her own inner wisdom and insight and when she is obeying the more explicitly stated instructions of Menoth.
There is no understating the impact of the Harbinger on the current state of affairs in the setting. She has literally transformed the Iron Kingdoms already, in a few short years. Other factions are terrified of her. Within the Protectorate she is beloved, but the scrutators are not entirely comfortable with her presence. The priest caste has long been in charge of the fate of the faith on Caen, and the Harbinger represents an unusual complication to this, one that is not perfectly understood or easily reconciled.