Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    HannibalTheGreat
    Guest

    Default Farrow Brigands better than Venators now?

    Hi,

    am I the only one who thinks that Farrow Brigands are much better now than Venators?

    Ok, Venators have higher range and CRA, but Brigands are more versatile with their dug in, point blank and prayers. Statwise they are similar, the Brigands loose one RAT compared to Venators, but they have the better defensive stats.

    And Brigands are cheaper, too!

    Do I overlook something here?

    HTG

  2. #2
    Mig
    Guest

    Default

    Faction buffs?

  3. #3
    Soylent
    Guest

    Default

    RAT4 RNG10 versus RAT5 RNG12

  4. #4
    tomgore
    Guest

    Default

    CRA is an invaluable ability. Without it, ranged units with RNG 10 = useless.

  5. #5
    Kaptain Von
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soylent View Post
    RAT4 RNG10 versus RAT5 RNG12
    Both nudged ever so slightly over the sweet spots in the curve. I think there's a little love left in the Venators.

  6. #6
    Tyrannus
    Guest

    Default

    They fit two different roles.

    Brigands look like more resilient Trenchers. They run up on the flank and pick at things for a turn until they get to charge in. With no Advanced Deploy, and SPD 5 they're too slow to go full stall-the-enemy for a turn or two mode.

    Venators are our new Long Gunners. No where as good as a pure shooting unit, and the MAT 5 hurts a lot. I think that if they were still MAT 6 there'd be a lot less complaints about their hefty point cost.

    One of the better tactics I've seen with the Brigands in MKI was to knock a model down, then unload into it with a bunch of POW 12s. Even Khador 'jacks aren't immune to this sort of treatment, and 10 shots will do something to it. With so many nice slamming options (even paying out the *** for the Bronzeback) and three good heavies with Open Fists, it shouldn't be too hard to pull off this tactic against a light or heavy.

    With CRA, Venators get to hit stuff that isn't stationary, and they get to make sweet needly love to heavies. I think a lot of people are missing one important point though: Karax and Praetorians (with UA) both have Ranked Attacks, so Venators get to ignore them completely for targeting.

  7. #7
    thePlotDevice
    Guest

    Default

    We can't CRA into melee, correct?

  8. #8
    Soylent
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thePlotDevice View Post
    We can't CRA into melee, correct?
    Nope but ya never know about a UA.

  9. #9
    Sevwall
    Guest

    Default

    Rat 4 -> Rat 5 w/ CRA is miles and miles better.

  10. #10
    Zenassassin
    Guest

    Default

    The brigands are marginally better but still could use a little something else. Not sure what. POW, maybe?

    EDIT: marginally better than the mkI Brigands. Neither are even remotely a competitor for Venetors. Brigands would need to drop 2 points for that to be the case.
    Last edited by Zenassassin; 11-28-2009 at 05:27 AM.

  11. #11
    cunningweasel
    Guest

    Default

    It's only their cost which irks me; 5/8 would be better.

Similar Threads

  1. Farrow Brigands... Back to suck.
    By Haugfather in forum Skorne Community
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-01-2010, 08:34 AM
  2. Venators
    By Blasterbonatti in forum Skorne Community
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-10-2009, 10:37 AM
  3. Rorsh, Brine, and the Farrow Brigands
    By DaughterOfFrankenstein in forum Mercenary Community
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-10-2009, 09:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •