Is it better to run full invicts +ua instead of min invictors + archers. The invictors are marshling a gorgon an acting as my melee inf for my ranged army.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread: invictors vs archers
-
01-01-2012, 04:31 PM #1Conqueror
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 287
invictors vs archers
-
01-01-2012, 05:58 PM #2Conqueror
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- Columbia, SC
- Posts
- 160
Depends on what the rest of your list looks like. We'd need to know the points level you're planning on playing, the caster you intend to use, etc.
What I can say is that every time I run a minimum unit of invictors, I've always wished I had more. Also, I've NEVER taken them without the UA, and it would take a lot of convincing to get me to even consider it.Last edited by Prof-Chaos; 01-01-2012 at 06:02 PM.
-
01-01-2012, 07:01 PM #3Conqueror
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 287
Right now my list is.
Dawnlord Vyros
Manticore
Phoneix
Gorgon
Full invictors + UA
House Shyeel Battle Mages
The Gorgon was going to be marshaled with the invictors.
-
01-01-2012, 07:21 PM #4Destroyer of Worlds
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 5,225
Anything with CMA or CRA I never want to field in mins.
Sig Changed at Ed's request, he's still my fav though.
-
01-01-2012, 07:29 PM #5Destroyer of Worlds
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Colorado Springs
- Posts
- 3,527
Invictors + UA are so good it hurts.
-
01-02-2012, 11:48 AM #6Destroyer of Worlds
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Edinburgh, UK
- Posts
- 2,235
In this, definitely the Invictors.
Min + Archers will be ineffective.
Originally Posted by AJ the Ronin
Kallas, you are very odd person. I mean that in the best possible way.
Myrmidon Mayhem (Latest report: 12/03/2013) Originally Posted by Dawnlord Ed
[Anna Dmitrievna (Storm Sorceress|Spy)]| [Cloe Diego (Alchemist|Thief)]
Reply With Quote